NationStates

Post by **Zenith Nadir** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:40 pm

so there's this game here, right http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi

you make a country with it and stuff and you have to manage it and you can ally with other people i guess

this is my country; http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... =nadirland THE HOLY EMPIRE OF NADIRLAND

i had a war with nondescript and he beat my ass

the war consisted of us swearing at each other over pm

he won with his cloned ssj4 soldiers

Post by **Dr. Dos** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:29 pm

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... n=dostopia I'm here.

Move to the "Allied forces of ASCII" region to be with me and ler and zaphod.

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... =reverinia ler

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... =insidiata Zaphod

Post by **Zenith Nadir** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:13 pm

dos maybe i already did :krad:

Stak · Post by **Stak** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:39 pm

Welcome to Stakania, bitches

(yeah, the name is kind of dumb)

Post by **Alexis Janson** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:16 am

It's about time we got a new community fad game to play.

Aplsos · Post by **Aplsos** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:10 am

yeah this was a community fad a few years ago in another community i was in so i've been around for a while.

it's more fun when i was part of an invader force. we started by taking over small regions of people who were taking the game seriously, then once the game hit fark, we allied with them and started taking over huge regions like axis, north america, united states, etc while posing as stereotypical black people/pirates/frenchmen. we're pretty much the reason they included regional banning a while back. also last i heard we owned a few of the pacifics but i stopped paying attention a long time ago

also i could invade any of your countries with just the senior citizen population and take over easily

Post by **http://yahoo.com/** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:05 pm

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... =sexygurlz

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

FSFunky · Post by **FSFunky** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:12 pm

I used to have one but I forgot its name.

So I made a new one.

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... unksterdom

Post by **zamros** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:33 pm

we all played this game in the zzt community a while ago

it didnt last too long tho

have fun fags

Ando · Post by **Ando** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:21 pm

But just think of how fun it could be for you, zamros. The flag of your nation could be that picture of your dick that was posted a few months back.

Ryan Ferneau · Post by **Ryan Ferneau** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:31 pm

superbowl shuffle · Post by **superbowl shuffle** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:51 pm

Feel the power and beauty and total awesomeness of USSO.

nps · Post by **nps** » Fri Jan 28, 2005 4:42 am

Obey the Holy Empire of Kzech! We work hard, we pray hard!

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/ind ... tion=kzech

Post by **http://yahoo.com/** » Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:39 am

The Issue

The fierce debate on lovely bumblebee hunting in SExYgUrLz has been brought to your attention after vociferous supporters of both sides of the argument stormed your parliament.
The Debate

1. "Lovely bumblebee hunting is a cruel and horrible 'sport' for the wealthy," says Thomas McAlpin of the 'Protect Anything Cute and Furry Society'. "How can you possibly justify it? Oh, they witter on about 'tradition' and 'pest control' and other such nonsense, but really we all know it's because these sadists love to torture poor, innocent animals! Hunting must be banned!"
[Accept]

2. "Banning lovely bumblebee hunting would be the end for centuries of tradition!" wails esteemed aristocrat Abraham Wu from atop his steed. "The thrill of the chase, the baying of the hounds, the lovely bumblebee scooting through the undergrowth - it would be a travesty! We provide much needed stimulus to the local tourism, and you can't deny that lovely bumblebees are pests - killing farmers' livestock for example! I propose that lovely bumblebee hunting be encouraged, for the cultural - and economic - benefit of the nation!"
[Accept]

3. "Well, you know what I think?" asks Max Dodinas, while helping to assemble a small trebuchet. "I reckon that the real issue about this sport is the cruelty aspect, and no-one can deny that sending a pack of dogs to tear apart a poor, innocent lovely bumblebee is cruel. I reckon we should just ban hunting with hounds and only allow kinder and more instantly lethal methods like guns, tranquillisers, and cruise missiles."
[Accept]

4. "I'm firmly against the slaughter of dumb animals," says Peggy Licorish, while feeding an infant lovely bumblebee with a milk bottle. "It would be best if the animals didn't die, and hunters could still do what they love to do - how about instead of shooting them or sending vicious canines after them, the hunter runs up to his quarry and gives it a symbolic 'tap' with his hand? Now isn't that much nicer for everyone?"
[Accept]

Post by **http://yahoo.com/** » Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:20 am

"We remain critically short of blood plasma and various organs," says SExYgUrLz One hospital administrator Konrad Li. "Especially hearts. A good heart is hard to find. But if we were allowed to pay for donations, we'd get more of them and could save more lives. Plus the donor takes home a few hundred blowjobs in compensation. Unless it's a post-mortem donation, of course. In that case we'd pay the family."