Windows Port for ZZT
Moderator: Terryn
Windows Port for ZZT
Yeah, I know...Ando's at it again, making a new topic.
But this time it's a topic with a good point. As anyone thought of making a windows port for ZZT? If something like that was ever fabricated, ZZT would become far more compatable with present day computers than it is now. Plus it would save me the trouble of not having to go into safe mode to boot up ZZT. So, has anyone worked on any projects like this yet? Or what?
But this time it's a topic with a good point. As anyone thought of making a windows port for ZZT? If something like that was ever fabricated, ZZT would become far more compatable with present day computers than it is now. Plus it would save me the trouble of not having to go into safe mode to boot up ZZT. So, has anyone worked on any projects like this yet? Or what?
- Dr. Dos
- OH YES! USE VINE WHIP! <3
- Posts: 1772
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Washington
ZZT++ I think
I don't know it took Exo several months to port MZX and he HAD the source code. We don't.
I don't know it took Exo several months to port MZX and he HAD the source code. We don't.
Visit the Museum of ZZT
Follow Worlds of ZZT on Twitter
Apologies for the old post you may have just read.
Follow Worlds of ZZT on Twitter
Apologies for the old post you may have just read.
What would we benefit from a Windows port?
Please note that is not a personal attack on Ando in anyway, I just fail to see the usefulness of a Windows port if ZZT runs fine as it is.
Sure, some might have problems running it, but those problems are usually solved by running DosBox or something similar.
What I'm trying to say is, Ando (or anyone else for that matter), what is there to gain by making a Windows port?
However, if by some magic we were able to get the source code (which is 99.9999% impossible, I know) I doubt a Windows port is the first thing to do on the agenda.
Please note that is not a personal attack on Ando in anyway, I just fail to see the usefulness of a Windows port if ZZT runs fine as it is.
Sure, some might have problems running it, but those problems are usually solved by running DosBox or something similar.
What I'm trying to say is, Ando (or anyone else for that matter), what is there to gain by making a Windows port?
However, if by some magic we were able to get the source code (which is 99.9999% impossible, I know) I doubt a Windows port is the first thing to do on the agenda.
FUNKY DEFINITION: MAKE THEM BOYS GO LOCO
- Quantum P.
- Level 17 Accordion Thief
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:41 am
- Location: Edmonds, WA
- Contact:
- Dr. Dos
- OH YES! USE VINE WHIP! <3
- Posts: 1772
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Washington
ZZT experience was like 90% done and for the most part it worked great.
But of course, anything that almost works gets cancelled.
But of course, anything that almost works gets cancelled.
Visit the Museum of ZZT
Follow Worlds of ZZT on Twitter
Apologies for the old post you may have just read.
Follow Worlds of ZZT on Twitter
Apologies for the old post you may have just read.
- Dr. Dos
- OH YES! USE VINE WHIP! <3
- Posts: 1772
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Washington
i believe winxp emulates dos for dos programs.
Stop treating this like Y2k.
It's called Dosbox. Or like $30 on e-bay for a 486.
Stop treating this like Y2k.
It's called Dosbox. Or like $30 on e-bay for a 486.
Visit the Museum of ZZT
Follow Worlds of ZZT on Twitter
Apologies for the old post you may have just read.
Follow Worlds of ZZT on Twitter
Apologies for the old post you may have just read.
Actually, Windows Longhorn will break any compatibility with dos programs, since it will no longer emulate Dos.Dr. Dos wrote:i believe winxp emulates dos for dos programs.
Stop treating this like Y2k.
It's called Dosbox. Or like $30 on e-bay for a 486.
However, I guess a port of Dosbox isn't long behind then
Also, as it is looking now, there is no good reason to upgrade to Longhorn as an average user, and now that the WinFS is removed, the supposed extra security is also gone
I'm not sure if the whole XML-meta-related data still is in, but it doesn't seem that useful to me.
FUNKY DEFINITION: MAKE THEM BOYS GO LOCO
that's good
it's good to hear zzt++ mentioned after such a long time. i haven't worked on it for...oh...a year or something.
zzt++ wasn't meant to be a windows port. i tried a x-win port (for linux) once, but i lacked the skills. the problem with making a good windows port was the lack of a good library. all you have under windows is the console app library. which doens't give you what's needed. i have seen windows attempts, though. i'm not enough of a win programmer to know how to do that.
zzt++ wasn't meant to be a windows port. i tried a x-win port (for linux) once, but i lacked the skills. the problem with making a good windows port was the lack of a good library. all you have under windows is the console app library. which doens't give you what's needed. i have seen windows attempts, though. i'm not enough of a win programmer to know how to do that.
wep
- superbowl shuffle
- Official Clamp School Defender
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 4:52 am
- Location: CAsE SenSiTiVe
- Quantum P.
- Level 17 Accordion Thief
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:41 am
- Location: Edmonds, WA
- Contact:
If this scenario is an apocalypse, it'll probably end up something like the coming Ice Age. Microsoft will eventually manage to push DOS off every computer, but seeing the number of classic DOS games and the number of fans who adore them, it will take years and years to do this. And even then, we'll still have emulators.
I mean seriously, there are emulators for some of the most obscure computers ever made. So considering the wealth of programs made for dos I don't think microsoft's anti-backwards compatability notions will snuff out dos. We'll see in 50 years or so, but by then I hope to have moved on from zzt :P
*POW* *CLANK* *PING*