Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:47 pm
by Appliance
Quindo wrote:ill check some of those peoples games. Also if zzt does not censore the containt of games that is fine. But, one thing is clear, Some people would leave once the downloaded a bad game. They would think everone made bad games.
Just like how all Iraqi's are terrorists?

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:52 pm
by Quindo
correct

Re: rating system

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:10 pm
by Zenith Nadir
superbowl shuffle wrote:I think the best way to help our friend here is by recommending authors whose body of work consists of clean games. Some of those would be Madguy, Nivek, Greg Janson, Chronos, and Koopo.
nivek? so satanic imagery is ok but sex is not? okay then!

one game i always felt was sadly underrated is sombrero by dark flr. it is clean but there is blood and cussing so it may be too violent, like bomb squad

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:34 pm
by wil
I beleive my public releases are all clean fun. Please someone stop me if i'm wrong about this; but i know other people's younger siblings had them play banana quest and probably voyage of four though it's a buggy things. Run on is clean.

edit: i suppose i have broken the streak with BFI - but brainfuck is the proper name of the programming language and bowlderlizing it is looked down upon. Anyway it's a utility not a game so i can't imagine it woudl be that fun anyway.

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:28 pm
by Quindo
I also think run-on is clean. Monsters are just a part games. Some are good and some are not... Its how you 'tell the story'... say, 'A zombie comes up and sucks your brains out of you nose' is alot differant then, 'A zombie chatches you...Gameover'... See what i mean.

p.s. Zenith what do you mean by satanic imagery ? Do you play satin or fight him?

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 7:12 pm
by Dr. Dos
Burly Brawl

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 7:35 pm
by Zenith Nadir
statins

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:28 am
by Schroedingers Cat
as in "gas statins?"