Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 2:15 am
good. now back to nadir's scheduled reaction...
Thats "Yaoi". ^^ Sexy, isnt it? Lol!
(now with accompanying captions)
z2
I agree. Take me to the spicy page.
http://zzt.org/fora/
My Brain Juice Blood Will Paint The Walls
Page 2 of 5
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:12 am
Nupanick, this is my far my most favourite thread ever, in my 5 year ZZT history. So fuck you. I am personally going to make this the first 200 page thread in all history.
Thats "Yaoi". ^^ Sexy, isnt it? Lol!
(now with accompanying captions)
Thats "Yaoi". ^^ Sexy, isnt it? Lol!
(now with accompanying captions)
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:25 pm
ps nupanick == guyx<im_gofer> Guy and I are debating about gay marriage and why it is right or wrong.
<im_gofer> I'd like Guy to state his reasons why he thinks it is wrong.
<_GuyX_> okay,
<_GuyX_> WHo goes first?
<el_fuego> you
<nondescript> ..you
<nondescript> gofer just got done saying so
<_GuyX_> oh.
<_GuyX_> I dont know.
<_GuyX_> Mainly because I dont like it. so there.
* _GuyX_ has left #MZXdebate (Leaving)
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:21 am
... 
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:44 pm
I'd be interested in a discussion about equal rights marriage. I've read up on the discussion in America and I wonder if there is any opposition from other factions than politicized religious groups.
The covert argument seems to be that gay relationships are somehow a corrupted imitation of the natural order. Some arguments go for the marriage itself being an open door for all kinds of mishappenings, the others seem to think it will fuck up institutions, tradition and the whole fabric of society will CAVE IN TO THE FORCES OF HOT LESBIAN SEX AND SODOMY.
But I'm being predisposed.
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:41 pm
the problem is it's called marriage, which is religious, when really for the most part it's all about the tax breaks and the hospital visitation rights.
They should have two different things. Civil Unions, which even straight people, or even those in a strictly platonic relationship can have and gives you the rights, and marriage which is done in a church or what not and has absolutely no legal meaning whatsoever because it's a sacrament, a belief, and is in violation of separation of church and state.
divorce, then would only be religious, not legally binding. Your wife would have to annul the civil union to steal your house.
Oh yeah, then they could make a lot of money if you have to pay a big fee to get civil unioned.
They should have two different things. Civil Unions, which even straight people, or even those in a strictly platonic relationship can have and gives you the rights, and marriage which is done in a church or what not and has absolutely no legal meaning whatsoever because it's a sacrament, a belief, and is in violation of separation of church and state.
divorce, then would only be religious, not legally binding. Your wife would have to annul the civil union to steal your house.
Oh yeah, then they could make a lot of money if you have to pay a big fee to get civil unioned.
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:18 pm
...that is freaking AWESOME. The illusive separation of church and state would be a lot easier if we separated marriage from tax forms. Someone needs to send this in to their senator, "Marriage-based rights are in violation of the separation of church and state," followed by "people should get those rights instead for applying for a civil union, which has no religious restrictions."Commodore wrote:the problem is it's called marriage, which is religious, when really for the most part it's all about the tax breaks and the hospital visitation rights.
They should have two different things. Civil Unions, which even straight people, or even those in a strictly platonic relationship can have and gives you the rights, and marriage which is done in a church or what not and has absolutely no legal meaning whatsoever because it's a sacrament, a belief, and is in violation of separation of church and state.
divorce, then would only be religious, not legally binding. Your wife would have to annul the civil union to steal your house.
Oh yeah, then they could make a lot of money if you have to pay a big fee to get civil unioned.
Let's see if that'll get the media's attention ;)
...where in the bible does it define marriage, anyway? I bet that passage is vague enough to argue with the anti-gays' interpretation of it. Does anyone know where exactly in the bible it says that a marriage is the union of a man and woman?
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:16 am
wow, it seems you've flipped on the issue quite suddenly. how can i be sure you're not just trying to quickly diffuse the tension?
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:41 am
what's with not posting more shojo
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:17 am
sorry, i guess it's because nadir stopped replying. i ... i need him.
I worked the picture over again a little bit. Added more water to make them look drenched as their shirts suggest. I think it looks better.
and it's yaoi i've been googling, you idiot!
I worked the picture over again a little bit. Added more water to make them look drenched as their shirts suggest. I think it looks better.
and it's yaoi i've been googling, you idiot!
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:44 pm
Seriously, though, where does it say in the bible what marriage is?nps wrote:wow, it seems you've flipped on the issue quite suddenly. how can i be sure you're not just trying to quickly diffuse the tension?
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:58 pm
whats the bible?
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:03 pm
Get this debate shit off of z2 and back to dmzx where it can fail miserably there instead.
Edit:
Edit:
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:23 am
yeah! fuck the bible! it's just a dumb book written by idiots! GRRRR!
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:15 pm
Gay Marriage
Zaphod :gay: :ler:
Zaphod :gay: :ler: