Why did building seven fall down?
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:25 am
was it from little fires?
was it from little fires?
Page 1 of 5
was it from little fires?
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:55 am
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:49 am
imagine having a two really big tall stacks of dominoes and a lot of little ones closeby
the two really big stacks fall down and shake up everything
some of your little stacks are bound to fall too
the two really big stacks fall down and shake up everything
some of your little stacks are bound to fall too
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:02 am
so, skyscrapers are made to withstand earthquakes but not other skyscrapers falling down?
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:49 am
quick flimsy! Make a video and put it on youtube about this conspiracy.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:05 am
why did it fall down, dos? it was over 300 feet away from the towers
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:19 am
I think Flimsy is trying to tell us that he did it.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:43 am
this is a serious discussion, mad tom.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:44 am
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:22 am
because seven eight nine
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:06 am
because seven is a hermaphrodite
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:46 pm
oh yes, all the buildings in nyc are built to withstand the terrible earthquakes that happen there all the timeFlimsy Parkins wrote:so, skyscrapers are made to withstand earthquakes but not other skyscrapers falling down?
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:48 pm
this is what i was expectingBoonoB wrote:because seven eight nine
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:11 pm
The towers were over 1300 feet tall, and they didn't just stop burning after they fell down.Flimsy Parkins wrote:why did it fall down, dos? it was over 300 feet away from the towers
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:06 am
Well, Larry Silverstein, on the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds" said "I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." Note that to "pull" something is industry jargon for a planned demolition.
Which brings me to my next point:
If America has the best military, the best defense, how can not one, but two airplanes crash into the WTC on the same day, minutes apart from each other?
Why did Rumsfeld tell NORAD to stand down, to not intercept the hijacked planes?
What caused the towers to collapse? (Hint: Alluminum airplanes don't make steel skyscrapers collapse. And don't give me that bullshit about the jet fuel being too hot - there were people standing in the window ledges, and they were alive and not burning alive.)
Why have there been so few terrorist attacks and threats since, mmm?
Most auspicious, yes.
I can answer your first question, the mysterious "they" decided to pull it. Now you must answer my question, yes, answer my questions he must. The fat one knows...
Which brings me to my next point:
If America has the best military, the best defense, how can not one, but two airplanes crash into the WTC on the same day, minutes apart from each other?
Why did Rumsfeld tell NORAD to stand down, to not intercept the hijacked planes?
What caused the towers to collapse? (Hint: Alluminum airplanes don't make steel skyscrapers collapse. And don't give me that bullshit about the jet fuel being too hot - there were people standing in the window ledges, and they were alive and not burning alive.)
Why have there been so few terrorist attacks and threats since, mmm?
Most auspicious, yes.
I can answer your first question, the mysterious "they" decided to pull it. Now you must answer my question, yes, answer my questions he must. The fat one knows...